{"id":72,"date":"2022-04-21T17:42:15","date_gmt":"2022-04-21T17:42:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/chapter\/box-5-use-of-well-record-data-to-compare-yield-distributions\/"},"modified":"2022-07-15T03:43:10","modified_gmt":"2022-07-15T03:43:10","slug":"box-5-use-of-well-record-data-to-compare-yield-distributions","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/chapter\/box-5-use-of-well-record-data-to-compare-yield-distributions\/","title":{"raw":"Box 5 Use of Well Record Data to Compare Yield Distributions","rendered":"Box 5 Use of Well Record Data to Compare Yield Distributions"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"box-5-use-of-well-record-data-to-compare-yield-distributions\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Using available well record data from Finland (Central Finland Regional Environment Centre, 2007), Norway (Morland, 1997; Geological Survey of Norway, 2008) and Sweden (Gustafson, 2002), Banks and others (2010) compared the distribution of short-term yields from crystalline bedrock types. Despite differences in lithologies, climate and tectonic history between the countries, the yields in the datasets showed a remarkably similar distribution (Figure\u00a0Box\u00a05-1). In addition, although wells drilled in crystalline bedrock can exhibit a wide range of yields, the median well yield of all three datasets was in the 600 to 700\u00a0L\/h range. Based on these results, the apparent bulk transmissivity based on an observed empirical relationship between short-term specific capacity and apparent transmissivity in crystalline rocks of the upper 70 to 80\u00a0m of crystalline bedrock aquifers in this region was estimated to be about 0.56\u00b10.3\u00a0m<sup>2<\/sup>\/d. An understanding of the statistical distribution of hydraulic properties of crystalline bedrock aquifers is needed to inform cost-effective drilling strategies in these types of aquifers.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/23\/2022\/04\/image17.png\" alt=\"Graph comparing the distribution of short-term well yield in crystalline bedrock aquifers of Central Finland, Norway and Sweden\" width=\"734\" height=\"617\" \/><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal figcaption-text\"><strong>Figure\u00a0Box\u00a05<\/strong><strong>-<\/strong><strong>1\u00a0<\/strong><strong>\u2013<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Comparison of the distribution of short-term well yield in crystalline bedrock aquifers of Central Finland (n=1297), Norway (Caledonian metasediments, n=2098; all crystalline rock, n=26,811) and Sweden (n=59,000). Note the probability scale on the y-axis and the logarithmic scale on the x-axis (from Banks et al., 2010).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: right;\"><a href=\"#RefBox5\"><span class=\"import-Hyperlink\">Return to <\/span><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/part\/uses-of-well-record-databases#RefBox5\"><span class=\"import-Hyperlink\">where the text links to Box\u00a05<\/span><\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<div class=\"box-5-use-of-well-record-data-to-compare-yield-distributions\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Using available well record data from Finland (Central Finland Regional Environment Centre, 2007), Norway (Morland, 1997; Geological Survey of Norway, 2008) and Sweden (Gustafson, 2002), Banks and others (2010) compared the distribution of short-term yields from crystalline bedrock types. Despite differences in lithologies, climate and tectonic history between the countries, the yields in the datasets showed a remarkably similar distribution (Figure\u00a0Box\u00a05-1). In addition, although wells drilled in crystalline bedrock can exhibit a wide range of yields, the median well yield of all three datasets was in the 600 to 700\u00a0L\/h range. Based on these results, the apparent bulk transmissivity based on an observed empirical relationship between short-term specific capacity and apparent transmissivity in crystalline rocks of the upper 70 to 80\u00a0m of crystalline bedrock aquifers in this region was estimated to be about 0.56\u00b10.3\u00a0m<sup>2<\/sup>\/d. An understanding of the statistical distribution of hydraulic properties of crystalline bedrock aquifers is needed to inform cost-effective drilling strategies in these types of aquifers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/23\/2022\/04\/image17.png\" alt=\"Graph comparing the distribution of short-term well yield in crystalline bedrock aquifers of Central Finland, Norway and Sweden\" width=\"734\" height=\"617\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal figcaption-text\"><strong>Figure\u00a0Box\u00a05<\/strong><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><strong>1\u00a0<\/strong><strong>\u2013<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Comparison of the distribution of short-term well yield in crystalline bedrock aquifers of Central Finland (n=1297), Norway (Caledonian metasediments, n=2098; all crystalline rock, n=26,811) and Sweden (n=59,000). Note the probability scale on the y-axis and the logarithmic scale on the x-axis (from Banks et al., 2010).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: right;\"><a href=\"#RefBox5\"><span class=\"import-Hyperlink\">Return to <\/span><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/part\/uses-of-well-record-databases#RefBox5\"><span class=\"import-Hyperlink\">where the text links to Box\u00a05<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"menu_order":24,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-72","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":142,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/72","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/72\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248,"href":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/72\/revisions\/248"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/142"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/72\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=72"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=72"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/books.gw-project.org\/water-well-record-databases-and-their-uses\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=72"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}