5.6 Mini-Piezometers

Mini-piezometers (or piezometers) are commonly open at the end or include a perforated interval a few centimeters long with a series of cut slots or drilled holes near the bottom end of a metal or PVC pipe (Woessner, 2017). In areas with fine sediments steel wool is sometimes installed inside the end of the pipe or a sleeve of nylon mesh wrapped around the perforated interval to prevent plugging (Lee and Cherry, 1978; Simonds and Sinclair, 2002). Mini-piezometers can be driven and pounded into floodplain sediments with shallow water tables (e.g., Rivett et al., 2008; Brodie et al., 2007) and, less commonly, installed in drilled holes in bedrock stream bottoms (Kennedy, 2017).

The mini-piezometer is typically hand driven into the bed to a specified depth (e.g., 10 to 100+ cm) (Figure 61). In some cases, a conductor metal casing with an expendable bottom plug or center rod is driven to depth and then a slightly smaller diameter piezometer is inserted, and the conductor casing removed. The unconsolidated sediment is assumed/encouraged to settle around the piezometer, sealing it into the sediments (preventing short circuiting of surface water). In some cases, a flexible clear tube long enough to extend above the surface of the surface-water feature can be inserted in the conductor casing and used as the mini piezometer (Lee and Cherry, 1978). Installation of mini-piezometers in consolidated sediments (bedrock) requires mechanical drilling of boreholes and piezometer installation that seals the perforated interval from the surface-water body (Figure 62).

Figure showing mini-piezometer installation in unconsolidated sediments
Figure 61 – Mini-piezometer installation in unconsolidated sediments. a) through d) installation using a driving system with an inner solid rod and outer hollow conductor casing. The dual system is driven to the desired depth and the center rod is removed. A smaller diameter perforated mini-piezometer is inserted and the outer casing is removed (from Baxter et al., 2003). e) through g) installation using the driven casing as a mini-piezometer. A loose-fitting disposable tip (e.g., a bolt) is placed in the open end and the pipe is driven to depth using either a post driver or a sledgehammer. Once the desired depth is achieved, the piezometer is pulled back a few centimeters to allow the disposable tip to be retained in the sediment. The piezometer is then open to the sediments. Once a mini-piezometer is installed, the bottom sediment should be tamped around the piezometer to prevent water short circuiting the instrument. h) A fixed, pointed-tip, perforated, ridged-steel pipe (drive point piezometer) driven into the bed (modified from Woessner, 2017).

Kennedy (2017) used small coring tools to install mini-piezometers and seepage meters in a dolostone stream bottom. A Shaw Backpack Drill (Shaw Tool Ltd., Yamhill, OR, USA) was used to install riverbed piezometers (Figure 62a). Lucius (2016) also described mini-piezometer bedrock installation methods to measure heads and nitrogen rich groundwater discharge to a lake (Figure 62b).

Figure showing bedrock mini-piezometer installation
Figure 62 – Bedrock mini-piezometer installation. a) Installation of a river piezometer in a 5 cm diameter core hole in a dolostone riverbed. The steel piezometer was grouted using a grout-in-place method described by Pierce and others (2018). Head and temperature of the groundwater were measured both by a transducer suspended in the open hole and manually in the removable standpipe (modified from Kennedy, 2017). b) Mini-piezometer installed in weathered limestone. A 15.2 cm diameter PVC pipe was driven into the bottom sediments and weathered bedrock, and cleaned out with an auger and pump. The 1.9 cm diameter Solinst piezometer was installed on a PVC standpipe. As the large diameter PVC pipe is removed, sand was installed around the piezometer tip and bentonite was installed in the upper portion of the hole (modified from Lucius, 2016).

To determine the magnitude of the vertical groundwater gradient at the mini-piezometer location, the difference between the groundwater elevation (head) as measured in the mini-piezometer and surface-water stage (Dh) is divided by the depth to which the instrument penetrates the sediment (L) (Figure 63a and b). When a slotted or perforated interval is used, the midpoint of the perforations is used as the penetration depth. The convention used in the exchange literature is that gradients referred to as vertical hydraulic gradients, VHGs, are computed relative to the groundwater level in the mini-piezometer. A positive gradient (groundwater level is higher than the surface-water stage) indicates effluent conditions, the upward movement of groundwater, thus groundwater discharges to the surface-water body (e.g., Simonds and Sinclair, 2002; Woessner, 2017). A negative gradient indicates surface water is recharging the underlying groundwater, downward movement of groundwater (influent conditions) as shown in Figure 63b. The VHG may also be computed from measuring heads from the top of the mini-piezometer casing using the casing as the local datum (Figure 63c and d). VHGs are commonly cited in groundwater-surface water exchange literature and mapped spatially and temporally to indicate where groundwater is entering and leaving a surface water body bed. The concept of upward flow of groundwater as a positive gradient is a convention of the groundwater exchange literature. However, exchange directions and the VHG should be clearly defined when reporting values. It should be noted that in some works, only the vertical difference between the groundwater head and surface-water elevation is reported and used to infer the direction of water movement. This information is qualitative, though useful. However, it is important to note that this difference is not the VHG as the water level difference is not divided by the depth of mini-piezometer penetration (L) into the bed. Gradients are needed to compute groundwater discharge, flux and velocities.

Figure showing measurement of vertical hydraulic gradient

Figure showing measurement of vertical hydraulic gradient
Figure 63 – Vertical hydraulic gradient (VHG) is used to indicate the direction of movement of groundwater at a surface water site. It is computed relative to the position of the groundwater head. When the groundwater head is higher than the surface water head (level) groundwater flow is upward into the bed. This is referred to as a positive VHG. When the surface water head is higher than the groundwater head influent conditions are present. This is referred to a negative gradient, downward flow into the underlying ground water system. Orange arrows represent heads (water levels) measured in the mini-piezometer and the surface water feature. Green arrows are distances (L) to the bottom of the piezometer or bed of the surface water feature. The difference between the groundwater head measured in a mini-piezometer installed to a depth DL in the bottom sediments and the surface water stage is Dh. The large black arrow represents the direction of groundwater flow. The mini-piezometer is open only at the bottom. a) When the groundwater head is greater than the surface-water elevation, the VHG is positive and groundwater flow is into the surface-water feature (effluent). b) When the groundwater head is lower than the surface-water stage the VHG is negative and conditions are influent. c) Using a datum of the top of the mini-piezometer, when the groundwater head is above the surface water level flow is effluent. d) When the top of the mini-piezometer is used as a reference, flow is downward when the groundwater head is below the surface water head (Woessner, 2020).

When mini-piezometers are driven into the bed of an influent feature and the water table is connected to the surface-water feature, VHG represents saturated flow conditions (Figure 63b and d). However, if the surface-water feature is disconnected from the water table (water table is below the bottom of the saturated sediments, e.g., losing river, lake or wetland, or disconnected wetland) then mini-piezometer data will reflect vertical hydraulic gradients that do not represent saturated flow conditions (Figure 64 mini-piezometer 3). If such conditions are present, theoretically, a piezometer could be installed in the percolation zone (vadose zone) and no groundwater level would be present (mini-piezometer 2 in Figure 64). VHG values computed for conditions shown in mini-piezometer 3 may yield large negative gradients, in some cases values larger than -1, when head change and penetration ratios are large. In general, when a large negative VHG is computed, data should be reviewed to determine if the influent feature is disconnected from the water table.

Figure showing mini-piezometers installed in an influent surface-water feature
Figure 64 – Mini-piezometers installed in an influent surface-water feature with saturated bed sediment that is disconnected from the water table. Water moves from the surface-water feature to the saturated bed sediment (large vertical back arrow). Perched groundwater then enters the vadose zone and percolates to the underlying water table (small black arrows). The head in mini-piezometer 1 reflects saturated flow conditions between the surface water and its saturated bed. A downward VHG would be computed. Mini-piezometer 2 is located in the vadose zone and no water enters the bottom because the sediments are not fully saturated, so the piezometer is dry. The absence of water in the piezometer does not allow for a calculation of a VHG value. Mini-piezometer 3 is completed in the underlying groundwater system. Orange arrows illustrate heads and green arrows distances (Figure 63 provides additional details). The computed VHG at Mini-piezometer 3 is not representative of continuous saturated flow. In this illustration the head difference is large and the depth of penetration (DL at mini-piezometer 3) is also not representative of saturated conditions. (Woessner, 2020).

Water levels used to compute VHGs can be measured using several tools. Most often, the top of the mini-piezometer is used as a local reference as shown in Figure 63c and d. Measurements recorded are the depth to water inside the mini-piezometer, the distance from the top of the mini-piezometer to the surface of the surface-water feature and the depth of penetration into the bed (Figure 65). The type of tool used to measure the water level is a function of the inside diameter of the mini-piezometer. Thus, when designing piezometers, the measurement tool should be considered. Tools include a small diameter electric tape, steel tape, and/or chalked rod and measuring tape (Figure 65) (Woessner, 2017; Baxter et al., 2003). Transducers installed both in the mini-piezometer and surface-water body can be used to record head difference over time (e.g., Freeman et al., 2004). In some cases, where head differences are small or difficult to measure, separate clear flexible tubing can be inserted in the water body and attached to the mini-piezometer, linked, and a vacuum applied to this loop. This manometer board setup draws water levels above the surface and to a board with a vertical scale. Water levels are compared, and the differences noted (Figure 65) (e.g., Lee and Cherry, 1978; Simonds and Sinclair, 2002; Cox et al., 2005).

Figure showing measurement of water levels in mini-piezometers
Figure 65 – Measuring water levels in mini-piezometers. L is the penetration depth of the mini-piezometer measured from the surface-water feature bottom to the midpoint of the perforated interval. The datum is the top of the mini-piezometer casing. The black arrow represents the depth of water in the mini-piezometer and the light blue arrow the distance to the surface-water surface measured along the outside of the casing. Examples a) through e) are representative of influent conditions and f) is an effluent condition. a) A steel tape is lowered below the water level in the piezometer and the depth below the top of the casing is calculated as the hold measurement (value at the top of the casing) minus the portion of the tape that is wet. The tape is then stretched along the outside of the casing to measure the relative surface water level. b) Measurement using an electric tape. The probe is lowered into the well until the water level is indicated. The hold point (top of casing) is then read as the depth of water. The probe is then lowered along the outside of the casing to obtain the stream elevation. c) A mini-piezometer setup with a second hollow tube extending into the stream. This design is used to make a measurement of the water level of a turbulent stream surface. d) Installation of a pressure transducer (orange rectangle) in the mini-piezometer and a second one attached to the outside of the casing to record surface-water levels (Woessner, 2017). e) The use of a manometer board. An open-ended clear flexible tube is submerged both in the well and in the stream. It is fitted with a tee and suction is applied to raise water levels to the manometer board. The resulting difference in water levels is measured with the mounted ruler (Winter et al., 1988; Cox et al., 2005). f) Effluent conditions are instrumented with a small diameter mini-piezometer using a hollow root feeder tube (section with small circles) that is inserted into the sediment and an attached to a flexible clear tube. The water level in the clear tube is observed as the positive difference in water levels (small orange arrow). VHGs are calculated as shown in Figure 63c and d. (modified from Rosenberry et al., 2008).

Mini-piezometer gradient data can be used with measurements of sediment and bedrock hydraulic properties to compute local flux rates from Darcy’s law, and with seepage meter data to compute local bed-sediment hydraulic conductivities. When mini-piezometers are designed with a perforated interval that allows water to freely enter and leave the piezometer, falling head or constant head slug tests can be conducted to estimate the horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the sediments penetrated by the perforated interval (e.g., Hvorslev, 1951; Bouwer and Rice, 1976, 1989; Van der Kamp, 1976; Butler, 1997; Butler et al., 2003; Butler and Healey, 1998). Sampling of bed and floodplain sediments and coring of bedrock can be used to estimate and measure hydraulic conductivities using lab and field methods (e.g., Freeze and Cherry, 1979; Fetter, 2001; Cedergren, 1997; Woessner and Poeter, 2020). As the exchange of water at the bed is assumed to be vertical, vertical hydraulic conductivity values are needed. Often vertical hydraulic conductivity is estimated from horizontal hydraulic conductivity by assuming an anisotropy ratio, that is a ratio of horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Kh) and vertical hydraulic conductivity (Kv) (e.g., Fetter, 2001; Anderson et al., 2015). The challenge with this approach is selecting an appropriate ratio; the range is typically between 1 and 1000. Ideally, independent methods to measure or estimate the vertical hydraulic conductivity directly in some of the locations where horizontal values are estimated is recommended. This can be accomplished in some settings by using lab permeameter measurements on undisturbed vertical cores of the site sediments and bedrock. If conditions permit, pushing or pounding of an open-ended pipe into the bottom sediments (e.g., on the order of 20 to 50 cm) can be used to conduct an in situ falling head permeameter test (e.g., Kennedy et al., 2010). Pairing mini-piezometer measurements with seepage meter flux values is a common method used to compute vertical hydraulic conductivities when both instruments are installed at a single site.

When both mini-piezometer VHG data and estimates of vertical hydraulic conductivities are obtained at a site, flux rates can be computed using Darcy’s law (assuming vertical flow and steady state conditions) as shown in Equation 3. When gradients derived from VHG determinations are used in Darcy’s Law related equations the convention that groundwater flow is always from high to low heads applies and the value of the measured gradient at a site is always entered as a negative value so that the computed term is positive. The sign of the VHG can then be used to describe if the discharge, flux or velocity is related to upward or downward movement of site groundwater. For example, field gradient data from measurements of groundwater levels in mini-piezometers and surface-water stages can be used to calculate the quantity of groundwater flux through the bed as shown in Equation 3.

\displaystyle Flux=\frac{Q}{A}=-K_{v}i (3)

where:

Q = discharge (L3/T)
A = cross-sectional area (L2)
Q/A = flux (L3/(L2T))
Kv = vertical hydraulic conductivity of the sediments (L/T)
i = gradient always entered as a negative value of the measured VHG(L/L)

 

License

Groundwater-Surface Water Exchange Copyright © 2020 by William W. Woessner. All Rights Reserved.