6.3 Shear Band Zones‌

The photographs in Figure 16a and Figure 16b show zones of shear deformation bands, often referred to as zones of shear bands. The slip on the small zone in Figure 16a is about 5 mm, whereas it is about 3 to 4 m across the zone in Figure 16b. The exposed portion of the scale in Figure 16b is about 75 cm. Similar to the growth of compaction band zones illustrated earlier, shear band zones also grow by sequential addition of individual shear bands, one adjacent to the other.

 

A picture containing outdoor Description automatically generated

Figure 16 – Shear band zones.a) A small zone with a few shear bands offsetting an older band for about 0.5 cm. b) A larger shear band zone with a normal sense of offset of about 3.5 m. The exposed portion of the scale in Figure 16b is about 75 cm. From Aydin and Johnson (1978).

 

The plot in Figure 17 shows how the permeability of shear band zones (simply referred to as deformation bands) may depend on the number of bands as well as on the permeability of individual bands (Shipton et al., 2002). Overall, the value of permeability across shear band zones decreases as the number of bands increases.

 

image

 

Figure 17 – A plot showing how the number of bands and band permeability (in millidarcy, mD) may affect the permeability of shear band zones. From Shipton and others (2002).

 

More realistic values of a deformation band zone permeability can be estimated by using actual single band permeability. The compilation of data shown in Table 1 includes porosity and permeability of compaction bands in various orientations to the cross-bedding and shear bands. Permeability was obtained by use of a field or lab mini-permeameter.

 

Table 1 – Permeability (in millidarcy) and porosity of deformation bands and their host rocks. Compiled by Deng and others (2012) from the sources listed in the first column.

 

Previous Studies

 

Permeability of Host Rocks [mD]

Permeability of Compaction Bands [mD]

 

Porosity of Host Rocks [percent]

Porosity of Compaction Bands [percent]

Antonellini& Aydin, 1994

1,000 – 5,000

10 – 500

~18

~6 – 12

Floding et al., 2005

123 – 5,991

N/A

16.6 – 24.4

N/A

Keehm et al., 2006

200 – 3,500

1 – 20

20 – 27

9 – 12

Aydin & Ahmadov, 2009

860 (average)

146 (average)

~24

~11

Lenoir et al., 2013

1,000

0.0006

~21

~14.5

Sun et al., 2011

1,300 (average)

210 (average)

~20

~14

 

Fossen et al., 2011

 

~20 – 1,000

 

~0.3 – 200

 

~26 – 32

~0 – 100 porosity reduction relative to host rock

Deng et al., 2015b:

high-angle sets

~140 – 487

~0.27 – 0.87

~21 – 32

~11 – 18

Deng et al., 2015b:

bed-parallel sets

~784 – 2,313

~3.68 – 755

~21 – 32

~13 – 24

Torabi et al., 2015

N/A

N/A

17 – 30

8.8 – 19.7

 

License

Fractures and Faults in Sandstone and Sandstone-Shale/Mudstone Sequences and Their Impact on Groundwater Copyright © 2023 by Atilla Aydin, Ramil Ahmadov, Marco Antonellini, John Cherry, Antonino Cilona, Shang Deng, Eric Flodin, Ghislain de Joussineau, Beth Parker and Jian Zhong. All Rights Reserved.